A technology suddenly made it possible to regenerate your body to peak health and live for 500 years - what would you do?
- would you be more/less reckless?
- would you play more/less right now?
- what would your relationships be like?
Tags:
no subject
More to come later, maybe.
no subject
My relationships would look much as they do now and I'd approach them similarly because... they are now, and I value them, they enrich me and I in turn give back awesome stuff into them. I think that the expanded lifespan would affect and broaden the way we form relationships, for what reasons and for what timeframes etc. I'd have a lot of fun with this!
But they're not based on a time expectation... if they moved/changed/shifted/ended I trust myself that I can provide a space of openness where this can occur positively and fond thoughts/friendship is still on the cards.
I get that relationships ending isn't a failed relationship... and I think with the expanded lifetime, this is one thing that would change considerably. There would be a need to shift the thinking on 'always and forever' as even over one life time things and people change and move, and that would increase if not in number of instances than the length of instances I would think.
I would try more reckless things I think. I am more willing to leap off something as I age and let go of things that hold me back... so I think that would have an effect on me with an expanded lifespan too.
no subject
If I had a pill that could revert me back to peak physical condition if I badly injured myself, say, I'd be far more willing to physically push myself, jump off things, or whatever.
no subject
That said, there's stuff that I'd love to be doing still--ice skating, skiing*, horseback riding, gymnastics, canoeing--that I do now in limited amounts, if at all. If I were to somehow lose the arthritis tomorrow, I'd like to think that I'd do all those things again, but more.
I'm assuming that allergies and the like would abate, as well, which would mean that I'd feel far more freedom to travel than I do. I'd love to spend a decade in Asia, say, but between the foods of death and the language barrier, it's not something that I feel would be safe for me at this point.
Interesting point about the partners, as well--I feel like there are three possible outcomes. The first is the one that
* Okay, it's actually not arthritis that keeps me from skiing so much as it is that the one time I tried to learn, I spend six weeks on crutches and my best friend spent several months with a cast after breaking his arm in such a fashion that the bone popped out of the skin and shredded his inner arm. I love skiing in theory, but in practice omg my ankle ow ow ow.
no subject
no subject
I think I'd probably approach relations like I do now, which can sometimes mean leaping in and sometimes mean spending years getting to know people... it all depends on the sets of circumstances under which I get to know people... although I do quite enjoy the long game, and being able to flirth with someone for centuries could be a lot of fun.
no subject
no subject
Relationships: In this I count myself uncommonly blessed. We would have so much *fun* together! 500 years! Together! It works for me! And friends - we would have so much opportunity to meet so many more...
Playing: You bet we will play more - not that not-play is a big part of our lives to begin with. As things stand, not-playing is in the service of two things - paying for playing, or keeping things in order so we can play. (This last covers a multitude of things, though, and way beyond simple things like maintenance. For example, environmental/civil rights activism is important to us - no environment=nowhere to play, no civil rights=no right to play.) We like to think that we have Priorities. Just not the usual ones!
Recklessness: Probably no real change here - we engage in a sort of calculated risk-minimised recklessness. When we plan a THING, we plan for all the things that can go wrong, and equip and train appropriately. And then we do it. Be it a long bike trek, kayaking, or rock-climbing - or anything else, really. We try to remember the six Ps. :)
So, overall, no real change - just lots more of it.
no subject
Also, put more money in the bank.
There would be no change in my relationships. Well, wait, now that I think about it, there is this 11 year old boy I would probably adopt, and I would take in one of the grandchildren, because I'd have plenty of time to raise him and still pursue my own interests.
Probably being the person I am, the first thing I would do is sit down and map out a 500 year plan, including all the things I'd want to study.
no subject
no subject