Short(er) seminar than usual, we had an alternate lecturer and whizzed through the material at speed.
Test#4 was 90% / 92.5% and that concludes the in class testing, one peer evaluation, one participation/debate and one exam to go.
Costs!
Exercise: Three products are produced, fixed costs are going to happen no matter what and are allocated evenly across products, variable costs are specific to product. Should we discontinue a product and if so, which product?
Product A is not profitable in itself, but it is soaking up $8,000 of the fixed costs and is thus useful. A wide variety of ways to do the maths - this is a long way. Another way is to focus on A, utterly ignore the Fixed Costs and just say 32k - 24k = 8k which is an example of only bothering to use the Relevant Costs.
Constraints on decision making - not just maths about cash, also things like availability of raw materials, relationships with suppliers, staff, legal constraints etc.
Break for snacks and chatting where we all compare what we're enrolled in next.
Contribution Approach
Analysis: Ginger beer is worth more per item (Contribution Margin per carton) but in terms of how many that can be produced (Contribution margin per machine hour) Cola is going to be more profitable.
Make or Buy decisions are when you choose between making a product or carrying out a service using your own resources, or pay an external entity to make a product or carry out a service.
Analysis: Pastries are cheaper (0.50) per item to buy on face value (0.60) but since we have fixed costs in equipment (0.14) and Inspectors (0.60) it's cheaper to make.
Example demonstrating Opportunity Cost: Can make 10,000 units of A which costs $29 per item or buy it for $25 per item. If we buy it, we can make $10,000 making B as well by using our capacity freed up by not making A.
Analysis: A is cheaper (25.00) per item to buy on face value (29.00) but we still have fixed costs (6) and even the extra $10,000 (opportunity) won't absorb them. Still cheaper to make even with opportunity cost factored in.
Then we ran away.
Test#4 was 90% / 92.5% and that concludes the in class testing, one peer evaluation, one participation/debate and one exam to go.
Costs!
- Relationship to product or activity
- Direct Cost
- Indirect Cost
- Relationship between total cost and volume of activity
- Variable Cost
- Fixed Cost
- Mixed Cost
- For other analytical purposes
- Differential Cost - differences in costs and benefits between alternative opportunities; relevant to future decisions
- Allocated Cost - assigned to a product or activity via some mathematical or arbitrary method; important to get right
- Sunk Cost - already paid for or owed by the entity; not relevant to future decisions
- Opportunity Cost - maximum benefit that could be obtained from a resource if it was used for some other purpose; cost of using resources for alternative opportunities.
Exercise: Three products are produced, fixed costs are going to happen no matter what and are allocated evenly across products, variable costs are specific to product. Should we discontinue a product and if so, which product?
Product | A | B | C | Total with A | Total without A |
Sales income | 32,000 | 50,000 | 45,000 | 127,000 | 95,000 |
Fixed Costs | -12,000 | -12,667 | -11,333 | -25,000 | -25,000 |
Variable Costs | -24,000 | -25,333 | -24,667 | -74,000 | -50,000 |
Total | -4,000 | 12,000 | 9,000 | 28,000 | 20,000 |
Product A is not profitable in itself, but it is soaking up $8,000 of the fixed costs and is thus useful. A wide variety of ways to do the maths - this is a long way. Another way is to focus on A, utterly ignore the Fixed Costs and just say 32k - 24k = 8k which is an example of only bothering to use the Relevant Costs.
Constraints on decision making - not just maths about cash, also things like availability of raw materials, relationships with suppliers, staff, legal constraints etc.
Break for snacks and chatting where we all compare what we're enrolled in next.
Contribution Approach
- Determine contribution in dollars
- Establish contribution in dollars per unit of constraint
- Rank opportunities
Product | Cola | Ginger Beer |
Sales Price | 18.00 | 21.00 |
Variable: Direct Material | -4.00 | -5.00 |
Variable: Direct Labour | -1.00 | -1.00 |
Variable: Overhead | -3.00 | -3.00 |
Total Variable Cost | -8.00 | -9.00 |
Contribution Margin per carton | 10.00 | 12.00 |
Ability to produce cartons per hour | 80 | 60 |
Contribution margin per machine hour | 800,000 | 720,000 |
Analysis: Ginger beer is worth more per item (Contribution Margin per carton) but in terms of how many that can be produced (Contribution margin per machine hour) Cola is going to be more profitable.
Make or Buy decisions are when you choose between making a product or carrying out a service using your own resources, or pay an external entity to make a product or carry out a service.
- Is there spare capacity? (must include costs of any revenue forgone)
- If no spare capacity, must include costs of displaced production
- 'make' option gives organisation more control over work
SA Pastry Sourcing | Cost to Make | Cost to Buy | Difference |
Variable: Direct Material | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.11 |
Variable: Direct Labour | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.20 |
Variable: Overhead | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.07 |
Fixed: Inspector's Salaries | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
Fixed: Depreciation of kitchen equipment | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
Cost to buy | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Total cost per item | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.10 |
Analysis: Pastries are cheaper (0.50) per item to buy on face value (0.60) but since we have fixed costs in equipment (0.14) and Inspectors (0.60) it's cheaper to make.
Example demonstrating Opportunity Cost: Can make 10,000 units of A which costs $29 per item or buy it for $25 per item. If we buy it, we can make $10,000 making B as well by using our capacity freed up by not making A.
Random Product | Cost to Make A | Cost to Buy A | Making B with spare capacity |
Variable: Direct Material | 5 | 0 | ? |
Variable: Direct Labour | 10 | 0 | ? |
Variable: Overhead | 6 | 0 | ? |
Fixed: | 8 | 6 | ? |
Cost to buy | 0 | 25 | ? |
Total cost per item | 29 | 31 | ? |
Profit based on 10,000 units | 29,000 | 31,000 | 10,000 |
Analysis: A is cheaper (25.00) per item to buy on face value (29.00) but we still have fixed costs (6) and even the extra $10,000 (opportunity) won't absorb them. Still cheaper to make even with opportunity cost factored in.
Then we ran away.
no subject
I don't just say that because I slagged off taking accounting this year in order to take Obscure Indigenous Language instead. (Hey, I am now reading you taking accounting, so it is LIKE I AM DOING BOTH. Whoa, the virtue.)
no subject
*g*
no subject
I, unsurprisingly, hollered, "Shenanigans!" and shied it into the recycling.
no subject
no subject
no subject