The poor planning often associated with toilets at public events sometimes leaves me speculating about some sort of decrease in female bladder size over the last 50 years. Alternatively maybe women didn’t go to many public events. Or perhaps voluntary dehydration similar to self imposed malnutrition to appear dainty and able to subsist on the occasional deep breath of air.
At the Duxton our merry group ignored gender and ended up using the facilities according to the symbols on the signs. People wearing skirts used the ladies and people wearing trousers used the gents (this was incidental but amusing). Other than water everywhere (apparent inability to turn taps on gently) it’s not unpleasant in the gents but I wonder how the men feel.
Does it bother men if the women use the gents?
At the Duxton our merry group ignored gender and ended up using the facilities according to the symbols on the signs. People wearing skirts used the ladies and people wearing trousers used the gents (this was incidental but amusing). Other than water everywhere (apparent inability to turn taps on gently) it’s not unpleasant in the gents but I wonder how the men feel.
Does it bother men if the women use the gents?
Tags:
no subject
Interestingly, I've spoken to a office cleaner who claimed that in her experience girls loos are usually messier than boys, at least for gender balanced offices. (It's a bit different when you've got a floor of 70 men and four women..)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Or stand real close to the urinal. These people need to realise the floor is not a toilet for crying outloud. :P