Monday, March 26th, 2007 11:56 am
I get why Maelstrom was more interesting than a lot of episodes prior (because we all love Kara and her issues) but I maintain that it is a character episode. There is no addition to the existing body of knowledge that would progress the show. Yes, we knew Kara was abused as a child, we knew she had issues with her mother, we knew she had a connection with the temple symbol and we knew Leoben spouted a lot of mystical stuff at her.

What’s new? Nothing. Her death didn’t reveal anything about her, the Cylon, the Fleet or their future and as such I resent having a lot of emotional triggers thrust at me without any payoff.

The Son Also Rises was a bit more interesting. It’s nice to see Lee back after being body snatched and out of character for a long, long time and our new lawyer Romo Lampkin was smokin’ (I mean that in a complex and interesting new character kind of way and a ‘god I love your voice’ kind of way – I loved Mark Sheppard as Badger in Firefly too). I’m not entirely clear on how this arc will answer my questions but they’ve got two whole episodes left in which to do it.

This is where Torchwood really fell apart, by the last few episodes I didn’t have any questions I wanted answered and I didn’t trust the writers. In sad, sad irony, the show that has consistently left me with a) questions and b) the hope of answers is Supernatural, which also has the lowest status (and most of my love).
Monday, March 26th, 2007 07:38 am (UTC)
I take your point about seasoning. Torchwood matured his light-hearted scoundrel persona by making him a brooding man of mystery which helped make him interesting - unfortunately I'm allergic to Broody McBroodypants.

It wasn't the characterisation that put me off though, it was the feeling the show wasn't going anywhere.

There would be this great, flashy introduction and a thrilling voice saying The 21st century is when it all changes and then get yet another Monster of the Week with a side serve of bisexuality.
Monday, March 26th, 2007 07:41 am (UTC)
From what scenes I've seen beyond the pilot, and from all the reviews I've read, the bisexuality stuff sounds pretty puerile - like the way a 14 year-old would a "sci-fi for adults" TV series, rather than one that's actually about adult themes.
Monday, March 26th, 2007 07:51 am (UTC)
I'm not sure quite what they were trying to achieve, but it didn't work.

I want to make some complicated point about constructing sexuality and about how heterosexuality is assumed and homosexuality or bisexuality is constructed because no-one knows how to write it without overdoing it and making it some sort of horrible, complex joke. I'll probably make it badly.
Monday, March 26th, 2007 08:02 am (UTC)
I'm of the sometimes unpopular opinion that very little on-screen sexual activity has ever been necessary or indeed even beneficial to the telling of a good screen story. There are a few exceptions, one of them ironically being Russell Davies' own Queer as Folk.