I prefer something clever to something moist...

[samvara]

the Prankster (43% dark, 39% spontaneous, 11% vulgar)

your humor style: CLEAN | COMPLEX | LIGHT Your humor has an intellectual, even conceptual slant to it. You're not pretentious, but neither are you into what some would call 'low humor'. You'd laugh at a good dirty joke, but you definitely prefer something clever to something moist. You probably like well-thought-out pranks and/or spoofs and it's highly likely you've tried one of these things yourself. In a lot of ways, yours is the most entertaining type of humor. PEOPLE LIKE YOU: Conan O'Brian - Ashton Kutcher

My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender: You scored higher than 26% on dark You scored higher than 8% on spontaneous You scored higher than 0% on vulgar

Link: The 3 Variable Funny Test written by jason_bateman on Ok Cupid

Comments

[evilmattikinz.livejournal.com]

I scored fairly similarly but had you ever heard of either Conan O'Brian or Ashton Kutcher? A quick google doesn't encourage me to become a fan of either.

[juffles.livejournal.com]

Conan O'Brien I can understand not knowing (bloody american tv show hosts) but...Aston? How can you not know Aston? He's sooooooo drreeeaaammmyy.

*shoots self in head*

[black-samvara.livejournal.com]

Meh.

Ashton Kutcher is hot in an I_brood_a_lot sort of way.

*shoots you again just in case*

[juffles.livejournal.com]

But you WOULD think that. After all, your humour has a "conceptual slant" to it, and we all know what THAT means.
I love that you care enough to put me out of my misery. *hugs*

[black-samvara.livejournal.com]

[mutter]

Conceptual people are good people to know!

It was the only merciful thing to do - us conceptual types are good at that

[evilmattikinz.livejournal.com]

Nope I even asked a friend, we English have never heard of your strange Australian humourmeisters. I think you are all making it up.

[cricketk.livejournal.com]

*nukes you from orbit*

It's the only way to be sure.

Hey! This is my schtick! I'm all about the celebrity crushes!

But not on Ashton Kutcher - he's not David Hewlett-y enough

[juffles.livejournal.com]

But not on Ashton Kutcher - he's not David Hewlett-y enough

I'll take this to mean "is actually good looking but tragically unable to appear intelligent if his life depended on it¹"

¹ Which, sadly, it isn't.

[black-samvara.livejournal.com]

Because survival and certain types of intelligence (tragically) are actually inversely related.